View(s) :
2 (0 ULiège)
Download(s) :
0 (0 ULiège)
p. 64-73
In this paper, I will argue with Ernst Cassirer that anticipation plays an essential part in the constitution of time, as seen from a transcendental perspective. Time is, as any transcendental concept, regarded as basically relational and subjective and only in a derivative way objective and indifferent to us. This entails that memory is prior to history, and that anticipation is prior to prediction. In this paper, I will give some examples in order to argue for this point. Furthernore, I will also argue, again with Cassirer and contra Henri Bergson, that time should be seen as a functional unity, and not as a collection of three different things-in-themselves (past, present and future).
Anton Froeyman, « Anticipation and the Constitution of Time in the Philosophy of Ernst Cassire », CASYS, 23 | 2010, 64-73.
Anton Froeyman, « Anticipation and the Constitution of Time in the Philosophy of Ernst Cassire », CASYS [Online], 23 | 2010, Online since 14 October 2024, connection on 27 December 2024. URL : http://popups.uliege.be/3041-539x/index.php?id=4609
Centre for Critical Philosophy, University of Ghent, Blandijnberg 2, 9000 Ghent, Belgium