https://popups.uliege.be/3041-5535/index.php?id=154 Numéros en texte intégral fr lun., 11 mai 2026 16:16:30 +0200 lun., 11 mai 2026 16:16:30 +0200 https://popups.uliege.be/3041-5535/index.php?id=154 0 https://popups.uliege.be/3041-5535/index.php?id=155 lun., 11 mai 2026 16:16:44 +0200 https://popups.uliege.be/3041-5535/index.php?id=155 https://popups.uliege.be/3041-5535/index.php?id=156 lun., 11 mai 2026 16:18:56 +0200 https://popups.uliege.be/3041-5535/index.php?id=156 https://popups.uliege.be/3041-5535/index.php?id=157 lun., 11 mai 2026 16:19:24 +0200 https://popups.uliege.be/3041-5535/index.php?id=157 https://popups.uliege.be/3041-5535/index.php?id=159 Une nouvelle chronologie du Gravettien français (Périgordien supérieur) est proposée à partir de l’étude de l’outillage lithique. Après un bref rappel sur le modèle de D. Peyrony et sur le contexte de l’étude, les résultats du traitement statistique mettent en évidence une structuration du Gravettien en 7 faciès chronologiques : Fontirobertien, Gravettien indifférencié, Noaillien, Rayssien, Laugerien (type A et B) et Protomagdalénien. Une esquisse typologique de ces faciès, prenant en compte les groupes d’outils présentant la plus forte variabilité, est alors présentée, puis leur répartition régionale. La discussion du modèle périgordinien de D. Peyrony permet de rejeter les indices de filiation entre le Périgordien inférieur et le Périgordien supérieur, et de confirmer la validité des termes de Châtelperronien et de Gravettien. À partir des données archéologiques et paléoclimatiques, et des datations absolues, la révision de la chronologie du Gravettien montre d’une part l’équivalence entre les phases IV et V2 du modèle classique et d’autre part l’antériorité du Bayacien et du Fontirobertien sur le Gravettien indifférencié. Une nouvelle structure chronologique des premières phases du Gravettien est alors proposée. L’interprétation des données paléoclimatiques simplifie considérablement le tableau présenté par H. Laville en soulignant la corrélation entre le contexte et les industries, comme pour l’Aurignacien : Bayacien, Fontirobertien et Gravettien indifférencié dans la phase froide inter Maisières-Tursac, Noaillien et Rayssien dans l’oscillation tempérée de Tursac, Laugerien et Protomagdalénien dans le pléniglaciaire. Enfin, le modèle établi dans le Sud-Ouest de la France est confronté aux données provenant des autres régions. Malgré une connaissance encore partielle pour certaines d’entre elles, la succession stratigraphique est en accord avec la région “classique”, ce qui permet de confirmer la validité de ce nouveau modèle. A new chronology of the French Gravettian (Upper Perigordian) is proposed, based on the study of the lithic industry. After a short recall of the Peyrony’s model and on the context of the study, the results of the statistical treatment reveal a structure of the Gravettian in seven facies : Fontirobertian, undifferentiated Gravettian, Noaillian, Rayssien, Laugerian (type A and B) and Protomagdalanean. A typological draft of these facies, based upon the groups which present the greatest variations, is presented, then their regional distribution. The discussion of the Perigordian model of D. Peyrony allows us to exclude the indices of the filiation between the Lower and the Upper Perigordian, and allows up to confirm the validity of the terms of Chatelperronian and of Gravettian. From archaeological and climatological data, and from the absolute datations, the revision of the chronology of the Gravettian shows on the one hand the equivalence between the phases IV and V2 of the classical pattern, and on the other hand the anteriority of the Bayacian and the Fontirobertian over the undifferentiated Gravettian. A new chronological structure of the early phases of the Gravettian is then proposed. The interpretation of the climatological data simplifies substantially the table presented by H. Laville underlying the correlation between the context and the industries, as for the Aurignacian : Bayacian, Fontirobertian and undifferentiated Gravettian in the cold period between the Maisières and the Tursac oscillations, Noaillian and Rayssian in the mild Tursac oscillation, Laugerian and Protomagdalanean in the pleniglacial. Finally, the model established in South-Western France is compared with the data from the other regions. In spite of a still incomplete knowledge for some of them, the stratigraphical sequence is in accordance with the classical region, which confirms the validity of this new model. lun., 11 mai 2026 16:19:44 +0200 https://popups.uliege.be/3041-5535/index.php?id=159 https://popups.uliege.be/3041-5535/index.php?id=161 Une révision du Gravettien français (Périgordien Supérieur) est proposée en se basant sur l’outillage lithique façonné. La structuration met en évidence plusieurs faciès industriels en succession stratigraphique : Fontirobertien, Gravettien indifférencié, Noaillien, Rayssien, Laugerien, Protomagdalénien. L’identité entre le Périgordien IV et le Périgordien Vb (“à éléments tronqués”) est démontrée, et la clarification stratigraphique ainsi impliquée. L’hypothèse de l’existence d’un Bayacien est approfondie. L’environnement paléoclimatique du Gravettien révèle que les faciès du Bayacien, du Fontirobertien et du Gravettien indifférencié appartiennent à la période inter Maisières-Tursac, le Noaillien et le Rayssien à la période tempérée de Tursac, le Laugerien et le Protomagdalénien au pléniglaciaire du Würm récent. Les différents faciès gravettiens et l’oscillation de Tursac font l’objet d’une révision des datations 14C à partir des seules dates du laboratoire d’Oxford. Puis le Gravettien français est replacé dans son contexte européen, où il s’y révèle comme la composante occidentale d’un peuplement gravettien européen. Quelques modèles de structuration du Gravettien français sont enfin étudiés, permettant à la lueur des données actuelles d’en rejeter certains, et d’en conserver d’autres, même provisoirement. French Gravettian has been revisited, based on lithic tools. The structuration emphasizes several industrial clusters, all of them in a stratigraphical sequence : Fontirobertian, indifferentiated Gravettian, Noaillian, Rayssian, Laugerian, Protomagdalénian. The identity between the Perigordian IV and the Perigordian Vb is demonstrated, and the involved stratigraphical clarifying has been explicited. The hypothesis of a Bayacian has been detailed. The paleoclimatical environment of the Gravettian shows that the Bayacian, the Fontirobertian and the indifferentiated Gravettian are present in the inter Maisieres-Tursac period, while the Noaillian and the Rayssian are present during the Tursac oscillation, and the Laugerian and the Protomagdalénian are present during the pleniglacial period. The different industrial clusters and the Tursac oscillation have been dated only from the 14C dates of the Oxford laboratory. Then the French Gravettian is located in the european context, where it appears clearly as the western component of the gravettian peopling through the whole Europe. Several models of structuration are finally discussed, allowing, considering the today data, to eliminate some of them, and to save others, perhaps only for a temporary time. lun., 11 mai 2026 16:20:02 +0200 https://popups.uliege.be/3041-5535/index.php?id=161 https://popups.uliege.be/3041-5535/index.php?id=162 The domestication of the landscape, the plants and the animals in South East Europe is considered in a multi-causal model which relates the symbolic and spatial contexts of social action to the longer-term processes of subsistence intensification. The article explores to what extent the spread of farming resources from Anatolia can be modelled through the sole agency of forager exchange networks in southern Greece, Thessaly, the central Balkans, the Tisza valley and the eastern Adriatic littoral. The development of a place-based world view in foraging societies is linked to increasing sedentism, just as in the case of most early farming communities. It is found that there is little need to rely on migrating populations for the introduction of farming in most of the area under study. The agency of incoming social groups is best supported by subsistence data in regions where there is a major disjunction between the spatial ideologies of foraging and farming groups. lun., 11 mai 2026 16:29:59 +0200 https://popups.uliege.be/3041-5535/index.php?id=162 https://popups.uliege.be/3041-5535/index.php?id=173 Until recent times the "tayacoid" industrie of the Eem-aged lower layer of the cave site Kiik-Koba investigated by G.A. Bonch-Osmolovskiy in the years 1924-1926 was the unique one for the Crimean Middle Palaeolithic. Several new sites with similar inventory has been discovered during the last decade on the territory of the peninsula. These are Kabazi II, IV-th layer, Zaskaya and Krasnyj Mayak 1. All the enumerated Crimean sites have produced similar inventories as to their main technological and typological characteristics, namely : highly pronounced trend to microlithism, absence of Levallois debitage, low indices of Fl and lam prevalence of sidescrapers among flake tools, presence of certain number of bifacially worked forms, "irregular" character of flake tool preparing due to the wide use of alternate and ventral retouch, frequently non-modifying and marginal, as well as slightly denticulate retouch. Similar industries are known also on the territory of the European part of the former USSR and characterised by the same age and almost the same technology and typology. These are Betovo (Desna river, Russia), Velikyi Glybochk (Seret river, Ukraine), Mersynja, Vykhvatintsy, Starye Duruitory (Moldova). The spatial distribution of these sites points in the searching for analogies on the territories of the Central Europe, and it is really possible to found the strikingly close techno-typological affinities with the so called Taubachian of the Eemian age in this area. The term Taubachian seems to be more appropriate for the moment for the purposes of definition of the East European inventories under discussion. There are also certain differences both between Central and Eastern European inventories and between the inventories within the latter. These can probably lead to distinguishing of different facies of the Taubachian in the future. Nevertheless, the main features are still stable and common : the connection with Neanderthal people, the same geochronological position, generally the same technological and typological characteristics, including fascinating trend to microlithism and to the manufacture of non-standardised flake tools. This evidence can be engaged as sign of specific way of human adaptation during temperate episode of the last interglacial. lun., 11 mai 2026 16:30:16 +0200 https://popups.uliege.be/3041-5535/index.php?id=173 https://popups.uliege.be/3041-5535/index.php?id=175 lun., 11 mai 2026 16:30:30 +0200 https://popups.uliege.be/3041-5535/index.php?id=175 https://popups.uliege.be/3041-5535/index.php?id=177 Technological study of the lithic assemblage from the Castelperronian level at Saint-Césaire (Charente-Maritime, France) reveals internal differentiation between "archaic" and "Upper Paleolithic" themes. This technology, associated with the most recent Neandertal known, is analyzed here in its spatio-temporal context. Observations pertaining to technological differentiation and to the organization of space in the rockshelter are presented, and the significance of these new data to the transition from Middle to Upper Paleolithic is briefly discussed. lun., 11 mai 2026 16:30:52 +0200 https://popups.uliege.be/3041-5535/index.php?id=177 https://popups.uliege.be/3041-5535/index.php?id=180 lun., 11 mai 2026 16:31:11 +0200 https://popups.uliege.be/3041-5535/index.php?id=180 https://popups.uliege.be/3041-5535/index.php?id=184 lun., 11 mai 2026 16:31:27 +0200 https://popups.uliege.be/3041-5535/index.php?id=184 https://popups.uliege.be/3041-5535/index.php?id=186 lun., 11 mai 2026 16:31:41 +0200 https://popups.uliege.be/3041-5535/index.php?id=186 https://popups.uliege.be/3041-5535/index.php?id=190 lun., 11 mai 2026 16:32:01 +0200 https://popups.uliege.be/3041-5535/index.php?id=190