<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Titanium</title>
    <link>https://popups.uliege.be/esaform21/index.php?id=2091</link>
    <description>Index terms</description>
    <language>fr</language>
    <ttl>0</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Surface finish of Additively Manufactured Metals: biofilm formation and cellular attachment</title>
      <link>https://popups.uliege.be/esaform21/index.php?id=2089</link>
      <description>Powder bed fusion techniques enable the production of customized and complex devices that meet the requirements of the end user and target application. The medical industry relies on these additive manufacturing technologies for the advantages that these methods offer to accurately fit the patients’ needs. Besides the recent improvements, the production process of 3D printed bespoke implants still requires optimization to achieve the optimal properties that can mimic both the chemical and mechanical characteristics of the anatomical region of interest. In particular, the surface properties of an implant device are crucial to obtain a strong interface and connection with the physiological environment. The layer by layer manufacturing processes lead to the production of complex and high-performance substrates but always require surface treatments during post-processing to improve the implant interaction with the natural tissues and promote a shorter assimilation for the fast recovery and wellness of the patient. Although the surface finishing can be tailored to enhance cells adhesion, proliferation and differentiation in contact with a metal implant, the same surface properties can have a different outcome when dealing with bacteria. This work aims to provide a preliminary analysis on how different post-processing techniques have distinct effects on cells and bacteria colonization of 3D printed titanium implants. The goal of the paper is to highlight the importance of the identification of an optimized methodology for the surface treatment of Ti6Al4V samples produced by Selective Laser Melting (SLM) that improves the implant antimicrobial properties and promotes the osseointegration in a long-term period.  </description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2021 12:46:45 +0100</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2021 10:31:32 +0200</lastBuildDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://popups.uliege.be/esaform21/index.php?id=2089</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Effects of lubrication, specimen preparation and tool coating on the friction behavior of commercially pure titanium at elevated temperature</title>
      <link>https://popups.uliege.be/esaform21/index.php?id=2137</link>
      <description>Titanium forming processes are often limited by severe adhesive wear as a result of poor friction conditions. This can be partially remedied with careful selection of lubricant, billet preparation and tool coating, but the optimal combination of these factors is not known. A full factorial ring compression experiment, with grade 2 commercially pure titanium rings deformed at 300 °C, was conducted to study the effect of each of these factors over three levels. The change in internal diameter was compared to a set of calibration curves generated by an FEA simulation of the process in order to determine the friction coefficient during each trial. A robust statistical analysis methodology was used to isolate and evaluate the effect of varying each factor. The choice of lubricant was found to be the most statistically significant factor by a considerable margin, followed by the method of billet preparation, with tool coating found to be insignificant. Of the lubricants tested, the graphite-based lubricant resulted in the lowest friction, followed by the WS2- and MoS2-based lubricants. Sandblasted billet surfaces resulted in similar friction to as-machined surfaces, whereas those subjected to micro-arc oxidation performed notably worse. For reducing friction during warm forming of titanium, a graphite-based lubricant is therefore recommended, with tool coating and billet surface preparation unlikely to provide significant further improvement.  </description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2021 13:09:22 +0100</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2021 09:58:21 +0200</lastBuildDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://popups.uliege.be/esaform21/index.php?id=2137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>