<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Auteurs : Ton van den Boogaard</title>
    <link>https://popups.uliege.be/esaform21/index.php?id=218</link>
    <description>Publications of Auteurs Ton van den Boogaard</description>
    <language>fr</language>
    <ttl>0</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>On the multiscale analysis of a two phase material: crystal plasticity versus mean field</title>
      <link>https://popups.uliege.be/esaform21/index.php?id=3644</link>
      <description>In this paper, a comparison is made between two multiscale methods, namely crystal plasticity finite element and mean field on a material composed of two phases. Both methods are used to homogenize a given microstructure. In order to obtain macroscopic behavior, in the mean field approach, a Self-Consistent scheme is used to evaluate stress and strain partitioning among the phases. In this method, an average of the fields is estimated and local distributions cannot be captured. In parallel, crystal plasticity simulations on Representative Volume Elements (RVEs) composed of hexagonal grains are performed. In these simulations, grain orientations are attributed randomly respecting Mackenzie's distribution function in order to achieve isotropic behavior and macroscopic hardening is extracted from the simulations. The results on macroscopic hardening of both methods are compared to distinguish the extents of validity of mean field homogenization. In addition to Self- Consistent, other mean field schemes such as Voigt, Reuss and Bound-Interpolation are compared in terms of efficiency and accuracy. The comparison manifests that Self-Consistent scheme is capable of predicting material behavior well. </description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2021 13:48:00 +0200</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2021 18:37:26 +0200</lastBuildDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://popups.uliege.be/esaform21/index.php?id=3644</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Self-consistent, polycrystal rate-independent crystal plasticity modeling for yield surface determination </title>
      <link>https://popups.uliege.be/esaform21/index.php?id=2738</link>
      <description>The evolution of the macroscopically observed yield surface has been the subject of many studies due to its significant effect on the numerical simulation of metal forming processes. Although macroscopic models exist that aim to define this evolution accurate data for calibration as well as validation of these models are difficult to obtain. One common approach is to use crystal plasticity simulations for analyzing the mesoscopic behavior followed by a homogenization scheme for gathering the aggregate behavior. In this study a similar approach is followed the difference being the choice of the crystal plasticity and homogenization methods. A rate-independent crystal plasticity framework where all slip system activities are solved implicitly using a backward Euler approach in combination with an interior point method for constrained optimization is used for single crystal behavior. The aggregate behavior is obtained using a self-consistent analytical homogenization scheme. The results of the homogenization scheme are compared against full-field crystal plasticity finite element simulations. The determination of the yield surface is done by considering the macroscopic behavior where the strain rate direction and magnitude changes over a threshold during stress-based loading.  </description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2021 18:52:51 +0100</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2021 16:03:30 +0200</lastBuildDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://popups.uliege.be/esaform21/index.php?id=2738</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>