<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Tufting</title>
    <link>https://popups.uliege.be/esaform21/index.php?id=2539</link>
    <description>Index terms</description>
    <language>fr</language>
    <ttl>0</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Draping modelization of stitched composite reinforcements</title>
      <link>https://popups.uliege.be/esaform21/index.php?id=3015</link>
      <description>In the aeronautic industry, thicker and more complex composite parts are required. Multi-layered reinforcements are widely used to achieve a certain thickness for the composite part. The tufting technology has become one of the most effective three-dimensional (3D) reinforcement technologies to improve the through-the-thickness mechanical properties of multi-layered reinforcements. A finite element model is proposed for the simulation of tufted reinforcements preforming. The textile reinforcement is modelled by shell elements, and the tufting thread is modelled by bar elements. A specific contact algorithm is developed to manage the interaction between reinforcements and tufting threads. This meso-macroscopic approach reduces the number of finite elements and saves calculation time compared to a mesoscopic model. The model shows a good prediction of deformations during the forming on a hemispherical shape. </description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2021 16:50:42 +0100</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2021 17:07:09 +0200</lastBuildDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://popups.uliege.be/esaform21/index.php?id=3015</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Investigation of the formability behaviour of optimized tufted and un-tufted multi-layer carbon preforms during the stamping process</title>
      <link>https://popups.uliege.be/esaform21/index.php?id=2520</link>
      <description>The originality of this work consists of studying the stamping behaviour of tufted and un-tufted multi-layer carbon preforms. Several tufted preforms with different stratifications have been manufactured. The stamping test was carried out using a hemispherical punch and conducted at two blank-holder pressures (0.05 and 0.2 MPa). The experimental data show that the addition of tufting yarn, the number of layers and the blank-holder pressure significantly affected the forming behaviour: the tufted preform presents a higher punch force, lower material drawin and shear angles with significant structural defects than the un-tufted preform. The increase of the blank-holder pressure increases all these characteristics and emphasizes the structural defects on the fibrous reinforcements. Similarly, the transition from two layers to four layers lamination at the same blank-holder pressure is followed by an increase of the punch force, reducing the material draw-in and the shear angles especially those measured at the transient zone, and causes more structural defects on all stamped preforms. Therefore, two localized tufting configurations, Right Localized Tufted and Inclined Localized Tufted, at the stamping transition area have been proposed. The results show that these two configurations present a minimum punch force and a maximum material draw-in similar to those measured on the un-tufted structure. The shear angles are much greater than those recorded on the conventionally (fully) tufted preform. Thus, the localized tufting in the most stressed areas proves to be the most suitable solution for the stamped preforms. </description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2021 13:08:08 +0100</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2021 11:10:43 +0200</lastBuildDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://popups.uliege.be/esaform21/index.php?id=2520</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>