<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Single Point Incremental Forming</title>
    <link>https://popups.uliege.be/esaform21/index.php?id=332</link>
    <description>Index terms</description>
    <language>fr</language>
    <ttl>0</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>On the Elastoplastic Behavior of Friction Stir Welded Tailored Blanks for Single Point Incremental Forming</title>
      <link>https://popups.uliege.be/esaform21/index.php?id=437</link>
      <description>The current market requirements are increasingly pushing the industry towards the manufacturing of highly customized products. Tailored blanks are a class of sheet metals characterized by the local variation of properties, attributable to the presence of different materials, different thickness distribution, and thermal treatments. In the manufacturing of tailored welded blanks, welding and forming processes cover a central role. In this framework, friction stir welding demonstrated to be a suitable candidate technology for the production by joining of tailored blanks. Indeed, sheet metals welded by this solid-state welding process typically exhibit high formability when compared to the conventional welding methods. Due to the improved formability, a good deal of attention has been recently given toward the single point incremental forming (SPIF) process and its integration with FSW. Remarkable efforts have been dedicated to the numerical modeling of the SPIF of metallic alloy sheets jointed by FSW. The main criticisms in these models are related to the definition of the mechanical properties of the materials, which are affected by the structural alteration induced by the FSW. The present work aims to model the local alterations in the mechanical properties and to analyze how these local characteristics affect the formability of the blanks. With this purpose, a 20 mm wide sample collected from a FS welded blank of aluminum alloy AA6082 has been modeled using the mechanical properties variation achieved in a previous work. The influence of this local variation in properties has been assessed using a Finite Element Model Updating strategy. </description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2021 19:38:16 +0100</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2021 09:13:32 +0200</lastBuildDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://popups.uliege.be/esaform21/index.php?id=437</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Revisiting flangeability in hole-flanging by single-stage incremental forming and conventional process</title>
      <link>https://popups.uliege.be/esaform21/index.php?id=1544</link>
      <description>Recently, hole-flanging by single-stage incremental forming (SPIF) has been proposed as a suitable process to perform hole flanges for small- and medium-sized batches with high flexibility in shape. However, this incremental forming has many differences compared with the conventional press working operation in terms of strain and thickness distributions, failure mechanisms and flangeability measures. In fact, regarding the evaluation of the formability of the flanges, the classical Forming Limit Ratio (LFR) should be used with care to quantify this property in hole-flanging by SPIF. Additionally, the FLC (Forming Limit Curve for necking) and FFL (Fracture Forming Limit) curves, powerful tools for analysing sheet failure in practice, may also yield erroneous prediction of necking in conventional press working or fracture in SPIF. The aim of this work is to present a comparison and analysis of the formability of hole flanges performed by SPIF and press working in AA7075-O sheets. Two complementary parameters to the LFR to compare the flangebility in both operations are discussed, along with the influence of bending induced by the forming tool and the stress triaxiality in the evolution of the principal strains during the forming process. The results point out the limitations in the current practice. </description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2021 20:10:02 +0100</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2021 18:12:01 +0200</lastBuildDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://popups.uliege.be/esaform21/index.php?id=1544</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sequential dual sided SPIF using low order geometry reconstruction</title>
      <link>https://popups.uliege.be/esaform21/index.php?id=331</link>
      <description>Harmonic decomposition is an analytical technique that is able to express a manifold surface as the sum of a number of simple surface harmonic components. By reconstructing the initial geometry using a reduced number of components, a similar surface is obtained with a lower level of geometric detail. Because small features are filtered out and the resulting surface lies equal parts above and below the original surface, a tailored multi-step SPIF (Single Point Incremental Forming) processing strategy can be devised. This sequential SPIF strategy uses three processing passes to form a workpiece. The first step is a regular SPIF operation using a conventional toolpath strategy to form the reduced geometry. Two finishing steps are then needed, one from the same side to form the smaller features that lies deeper than the reduced geometry and one backwards pass from the other side of the sheet. To add features that need to be shallower than the reduced geometry, the part is flipped around. The used sequence of these finishing steps and the toolpath strategy used significantly influence the final part accuracy and surface quality. The advantages and disadvantages of four of these combined strategies are examined and compared to regular SPIF. </description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2021 15:38:57 +0100</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2021 18:02:12 +0200</lastBuildDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://popups.uliege.be/esaform21/index.php?id=331</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>