<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Surface Roughness</title>
    <link>https://popups.uliege.be/esaform21/index.php?id=4288</link>
    <description>Index terms</description>
    <language>fr</language>
    <ttl>0</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Experimental investigation of effect of printing direction and </title>
      <link>https://popups.uliege.be/esaform21/index.php?id=3627</link>
      <description>The additive manufacturing has initially gained popularity for production of non-loadbearing parts and components or in the fields where the material strength and ductility are less important such as modelling and rapid prototyping. But as the technology develops, availability of metal additive manufacturing naturally dictates the desire to use the produced components in load-bearing parts. This requires not-only a thorough documentation on the mechanical properties but also additional and independent research to learn the expected level of variation of the mechanical properties and what factors affect them. The presented paper investigates strength, ductility, hardness, and microstructure of the AlSi10Mg alloy produced by the selective laser melting (SLM). The mechanical properties were determined through a series of uniaxial tension tests and supplementary hardness tests and rationalized with the microstructure evolution with regard to printing direction and heat treatment. The paper also addresses the effect of surface roughness on the mechanical properties of the material, by comparing the machined and net shape tension samples. As expected, the as-manufactured AlSi10Mg-alloy appears to be a semi-brittle alloy, but its microstructure can be altered, and ductility increased by a proper heat-treatment. The effect of surface layer removal on the measured mechanical properties is of particular interest. </description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2021 13:43:07 +0200</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2021 18:39:38 +0200</lastBuildDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://popups.uliege.be/esaform21/index.php?id=3627</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Effect of powder size and processing parameters on surface, density and mechanical properties of 316L elaborated by Laser Powder Bed Fusion </title>
      <link>https://popups.uliege.be/esaform21/index.php?id=1563</link>
      <description>Despite the attractive capabilities of additive manufacturing (AM) technology, the industrialization of these processes remains very low. This is attributed to the complexes physical phenomena involved in the AM process and the layered structure of the produced parts. Intense research work is still needed for the prediction and optimization of AM parts mechanical properties. In this study, the influence of particle size distribution (PSD) of stainless steel 316L (SS 316L) powders on AM parts properties was investigated. Four PSD were used to produce test parts and compare the resulting porosity, surface roughness and macro-hardness. The SS 316L specimens were fabricated by Laser Powder Bed Fusion process (LPBF) on a SLM 125HL machine using variations in laser power and scan velocity. Computed scan tomography (CT) was used to characterize the defects. Lack of fusion and keyhole defects were detected. Defects were detected even in nearly dense parts. The powder size distribution was found to affect the porosity. Results from CT tests were used to identify the minimum achievable porosities for each powder, through the appropriate selection of process parameters. The macro-hardness and surface roughness were found to vary with the powder properties.  </description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2021 20:12:13 +0100</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2021 18:14:24 +0200</lastBuildDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://popups.uliege.be/esaform21/index.php?id=1563</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cutting Performance of Austenitic and Duplex Stainless Steels with Drills of Three Cutting Edges </title>
      <link>https://popups.uliege.be/esaform21/index.php?id=4284</link>
      <description>Austenitic and duplex stainless steels are considered be the best in corrosion resistance among different grades of stainless steels. Due to high strength, duplex stainless steels applications are increasingly as an alternative to the austenitic stainless steels. In this sense, the machining study of this materials is an important issue, in order to better understand the performance of the tools and the quality of the parts manufactured for high-demand industries.  In this research, the machinability of both stainless steels was evaluated in the drilling operation, using drills with three cutting edges. This type of drill geometry is particularly useful when conventional solid carbide drills fail. The drill point of triple edge is very stable, demonstrating optimal positioning accuracy and better performance in deep bores.  Using the same tool geometry, a comparative analysis of drilling performance on austenitic and duplex stainless steels was made. In experimental procedure, external low-pressure cooling or internal high-pressure cooling was applied alternatively.  The cutting vibration, the tool wear, the roughness and the hole diameter accuracy were evaluated in the series of holes made. The obtained results show that the most important factor to increase the number of holes made is the use of high-pressure internal cooling. When external cooling is used, AISI 304 have a worse behaviour than duplex stainless steel, due to greater susceptibility to built-up-edge formation and work hardening. The tool deterioration is mainly non-uniform chipping for external cooling and flank wear for internal cooling.  </description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2021 17:49:43 +0200</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2021 17:49:47 +0200</lastBuildDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://popups.uliege.be/esaform21/index.php?id=4284</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>