Generation and homogenization of foamed polymer RVEs: microstructure-mechanical properties relationship

Online since 08 April 2021

Article

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to better understand the relationship between the microstructure of foamed polymer and mechanical properties. X-Ray tomography was performed on polypropylene foam specimens machined from injected plates. These plates were obtained for different thicknesses and exhibit different microstructure morphologies. The tomography scans were first digitalized and meshed. Then, numerical simulations were performed on representative volume elements (RVEs) to get homogeneous mechanical property of the material using a parallel C++ library Cimlib developed at CEMEF. Numerical methods described in this study focused on immerged or body-fitted strategy (FE context - level set framework - meshing adaptation) for exact and statistical RVEs generation. The numerical results were compared to experimental testing performed under tension and compression at different strain rates using image correlation. Good agreement was observed between simulations performed at the mesoscale and experimental tests carried out at the macroscale for both real and statistical RVEs. This methodology opens a way for the development of digital materials designed for specific mechanical properties.

Keywords

Foamed Polymer, Relation Microstructure-Mechanical Properties, Representative Volume Element, Digital Material

Table of contents

Text

1 Introduction

Foamed polymer materials are widely used in automotive, aeronautic and packaging industries due to their low density, strong ability to absorb impact loading, and their good thermal /acoustic properties. The final properties of such material depend strongly on the process that will induce specific microstructure characterized by volume fraction of pores, pores size/shape distribution, and neighbor distance distribution between pores. The purpose of this study is to generate and simulate Representative Volume Elements (RVEs) to better understand the influence of such parameters on the mechanical behavior of polymer foams.

Early work of Rusch and Gent [1-2] investigated the mechanical behavior of polymeric foams. However, only few articles are discussing about modeling their microstructure-mechanical properties relationship. The complex foam microstructure displaying heterogeneous morphology is a challenging area for numerical modeling. Experimental testing coupled with tomography are now helping to understand such relations. We can cite work from Weißenborn et al. [3] who modelled 3D X-Ray scanned microstructures using phase-field framework. The authors were able to capture the relation between compression modulus and foam density for values ranging from 200 to 600 kg/m3. Amani et al. [4] also performed finite element modeling on open-cell aluminum foam based on X-ray tomography. A damage elasto-plastic model was used to better understand location of possible zone of fracture in the material. More recently, Vestrum et al. [5] performed tomography based finite element simulations on polypropylene foams. They investigated the effect of the resin material behavior (perfectly plastic or enriched with linear hardening) on the mechanical response of the polymeric foam. They found good agreement with compression tests for an elasto-plastic material model displaying linear hardening behavior.

The study will focus on the development of a digital framework to generate and simulate the mechanical behavior of the polymeric foams from tomography to statistically representative microstructures. The generation and homogenization of these materials will help to better understand the influence of microstructural features on the mechanical behavior of the material. Recently, a FE library, CimLib® ([6-8]), based on anisotropic mesh adaptation and level set methods was developed at the Center of Material Forming (CEMEF) to model heterogeneous material. We plan in this work to use the current capabilities of this library and to extend them for the generation of exact or statistical RVEs of foam microstructure. Numerical methods described in this study focused on immerged or body-fitted strategy (FE context - level set framework - meshing adaptation) for exact and statistical RVEs generation. Classical multidomain lagrangian formulation with an enhanced body-fitted remeshing framework is used to model RVEs deformation. Numerical simulations under tensile and compression loading were performed for different foam microstructures with the aim of better correlating the mechanical response of foams to microstructural morphology. Numerical simulations on RVEs were compared to mechanical tests performed for different stress states (compression and tension) and strain rates.

2 Material

The material investigated in this study is a co-polymer polypropylene SABIC PP108MF10 that is mixed with a chemical blowing agent (CBA). This material is a designed automotive grade polymer commonly used by car manufacturers for bumpers. Plates of different thicknesses were injected using a core-back method. This method is an upgrade of classic injection method. The difference lies in the use of a mold which possesses a moving part (the “core-back”). A force is applied on the core-back to maintain during a short period of time the polymer under pressure. Constant pressure allows the polymer to be maintained directly in contact with the internal molds’ surfaces to solidify without foaming. Then, the mold opens at a fixed velocity which favors the foaming at the center of the part. This technique allows a good surface quality and a controlled foaming process (nucleation and growth of pores). Fig. 1 presents a specific foam microstructure characterized by a foamed core surrounded by two fully dense skins. The ratio of skin to core thickness as well as the pores morphology will have a strong impact on the foam mechanical properties. Three plates with thicknesses of 2.5, 3, and 6 mm were injected. X-Ray tomography scan were performed for the different thicknesses. Tomography observations are displaying different microstructures characterized by specific normal distribution of pores sizes and mean neighbor distance.

Image 10000201000006DB0000027CF3F553A4D0B030DA.png

Fig. 1. Three layers structure: Skin - Foamed core – Skin.

Specimens were then machined along plate thickness. Tensile and compression tests were performed at two different strain rates (10-3 s-1 and 10-2 s-1) at room temperature. Lubricant was used in compression to avoid specimen barreling. 3D Digital image correlation was used to measure the local displacement and strain fields during the tests. True stress and true strain curves were used for building the material database. Fig. 2. presents the mechanical behavior obtained in tension at 10-3 s-1 for different plate thicknesses. We can notice that plates of different thicknesses display distinct mechanical responses that are in relation with the pores volume fraction. More the pores volume fraction is important and more the material stiffness is decreasing. Test results on non-foamed PP are used to identify the resin properties for numerical simulations.

Image 10000201000006D6000002BF5DCE167D506218FD.png

Fig. 2. Mechanical tensile stress-strain curve comparison in tension at 10-3 s-1.

3 Numerical methodology

3.1 Full field methodology

We used in this study numerical tools and methodologies based on a combination of level-set method ([9]) and meshing adaptation tools ([7,8,10,11]. A level-set function, Φ, is defined on a domain Ω. Φ is the signed Euclidean distance function of an interface Γ and any point x of Ω:

Image 10000000000006E2000000A34D9E578C29670DD7.png

Thus, the interface Γ is given by the zero iso-value of the function Φ and by convention Φ is generally defined as positive inside the domain defined by Γ and negative outside. For describing correctly, the interfaces in order to reach accurate computation in the FE method, the mesh is refined around the interface. Meshing adaptation is performed by the mesher/remesher Fitz developed by [7,8] with the metric developed in [12] and adopted in [13].

An example of volume reconstruction is given in Fig. 3a. A real microstructure is reconstructed from tomography scans using ImageJ package Fiji. The stack is composed of binary 8-bit images obtained by applying a threshold. Then using Fiji, a signed distance function is determined to scale the distance from the interface. This distance function is then immersed using the Cimlib library inside an initial meshed volume. The first step consists in determining the level-set functions around the interfaces (Fig. 3b) serving as distance function for the mesh metric. Distance functions are then merged into a meshed volume and meshing adaptation/remeshing is performed using Fitz tool developed at CEMEF to discretize accurately the different interfaces (Fig. 3c). In the example, the final meshed volume (25.7 mm3) possesses around 106 million of elements. Fig. 3d displays isosurfaces (Φ(x)=0) representing the interfaces.

RVEs can also be statistically generated from exact microstructure (obtained from X-ray tomography) using a dropping and rolling methods [14,15]. Distribution of pores areas as well as mean nearest neighbor distances between pores is used as inputs to generate such microstructures.

Image 100002010000077B0000046788C2D59837E03372.png

Fig. 3. Full field methodology: (a) X-Ray Tomography; (b) Level-Set reconstruction; (c) Adapted mesh and (d) Pores isosurface (Φ (x) = 0).

For the resin, an elastoplastic model was used as constitutive law. The constitutive equation for the plastic model is based on a Johnson-Cook law for describing the isotropic hardening (Eq. 2). The mechanical behavior of the resin also displays time and stress- state dependency. However, the main purpose of this study was to investigate the capabilities of a simple constitutive behavior regarding the resin for capturing the mechanical behavior of the foam at the microscale level. With this purpose, the strain-rate effect was neglected and the identification was conducted independently for compression and tensile loading as the Johnson-Cook law does not account for stress state sensitivity. However ongoing work is in progress for accounting such phenomena regarding resin mechanical behavior. The slowest strain rate was used to fit model parameters.

Image 10000000000006110000004C157D8CD3D0CDB7CF.png

where A, B, and n are material parameters, σp is the yield stress, εp is the equivalent plastic strain.

Model parameters for the different media are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1. Model parameters for the different media.

Table 1. Model parameters for the different media.

3.2 Boundary conditions and RVE homogenized response

Boundary conditions for tension and compression are presented Figs. 4 and 5, respectively. RVEs represent the microstructure through the overall specimen thickness. Tomography scans were performed in the location of gage length for tensile specimen and over cylindrical specimens for compression tests.

The homogenized response of RVEs in term of equivalent stress (σeq) and strain (εeq) values were calculated by integrating their respective values (σlocal and εlocal) for each element over their volume, V, divided by the total volume of the meshed part (Vtotal) (Eqs. 3 and 4). Equivalent stress-strain curves were used to compare numerical results to experimental tests.

Image 10000000000007EE0000009084A30B8EA6C0BB33.png

Image 10000000000007620000008DF32194CB8BDACAC9.png

Image 100002010000078C000002626AE3126C684A91A7.png

Fig. 4. Boundary conditions of 2D and 3D simulations in tension.

Fig. 4. Boundary conditions of 2D and 3D simulations in tension.

Fig. 5. Boundary conditions of 2D and 3D simulations in compression.

4 Results

After performing a convergence study on RVE size for each plate thickness, computations were performed. Fig. 6a displays simulations for a real microstructure and statistically generated RVEs for material of 3 mm thickness. Results regarding local stress field are displayed in the figure. We observed that the stress concentrations are mainly located between close pores and for pores “clustering”. Statistically generated RVEs do not account for the complex pores shape exhibited by real microstructures. Only spherical pores are generated. Fig. 6b presents the stress-strain curves for two converged RVEs obtained from a real microstructure compared to a statistically generated one. We can notice a very good agreement meaning that pore shape is not a predominant feature controlling the mechanical properties of the material. We can also observe a good agreement between simulations performed at the mesoscale and experimental tests carried out at the macroscale for both real and statistical RVEs. Fig. 6c displays the mechanical response of RVEs generated from real microstructure compared to tensile tests performed at 10-3 s-1 for the three thicknesses. A good agreement can be observed opening a way for the use of such numerical framework to better understand the relationship between microstructure and mechanical properties.

Image 100002010000084400000572B4D11BC533D5E3B1.png

Fig. 6. a) Local stress field in tension for two different RVEs: the first one generated from real microstructure and the second one corresponding to a statistically generated microstructure; b) Comparison between model and tensile test for plate of 3 mm thickness at 10-3 s-1; c) Comparison between model and tensile test for the three thicknesses at 10-3 s-1.

5 Conclusion

Using a core-back method, three different plate thicknesses were injected (2.5, 3 and 6mm). Each plate was then characterized experimentally in tension and compression for different strain rates. Set of samples was also observed by X-Ray tomography to study their microstructures and generate RVEs. A full-field methodology in 2D and 3D was then used based on immersion and adaptive meshing and remeshing to generate and simulate RVEs from real or statistically based microstructures.

RVEs convergence analysis were performed to determine the optimized volume size for each thickness. Then, 2D and 3D simulations were carried out and compared to experimental data. We noticed that 3D simulations was in good agreement with experimental results whereas 2D simulations tend to underestimate the test results by overestimating the pore fraction. Such methodology providing digital materials may help the foam design to sustain specific material properties.

Acknowledgements

This material was based upon work supported by the Centre Technique Industriel de la Plasturgie et des Composites regarding the collective action focusing on developing new foaming process.

Bibliography

[1] Rusch, K.C. Energy‐absorbing characteristics of foamed polymers, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 1970, vol. 4, p.1433-1447. DOI: 10.1002/app.1970.070140603

[2] Gent, A.N., Thomas, A.G. The Deformation of Foamed Elastic Materials, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 1959, vol. 1, p.107-113. DOI: 10.1002/app.1959.070010117

[3] Weißenborn, O., Geller, S., Gude M. Deformation analysis of polymer foams under compression load using in situ computed tomography and finite element simulation methods. Proceedings of 17th Conference of ECCM, 2016, p. 8.

[4] Amani, Y., Dancette, S., Maire, E., Adrien, J., Lachambre, J. Two-Scale Tomography Based Finite Element Modeling of Plasticity and Damage in Aluminum Foams. Materials, 2018, vol. 11, p. 1984, doi.org/10.3390/ma11101984

[5] Vestrum, O., Langseth, M., Børvik, T. Finite element modeling of porous polymer pipeline coating using X-ray micro computed tomography, Composites Part B: Engineering, 2019, vol. 172, p. 406-415, doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.04.028.

[6] Digonnet, H., Silva, L., Coupez, T. Cimlib: a fully parallel application for numerical simulations based on components assembly, Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Numerical Methods in Industrial Forming Processes, 2007, vol. 908, pp. 269-274.

[7] Shakoor, M., Bernacki, M., Bouchard, P.O. A new body-fitted immersed volume method for the modeling of ductile fracture at the microscale: analysis of void clusters and stress state effects on coalescence, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2015, vol. 147, pp. 398-417.

[8] Shakoor, M., Bouchard, P.O., Bernacki, M., An adaptive level‐set method with enhanced volume conservation for simulations in multiphase domains, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2017, vol. 109 (4), p. 555-576.

[9] Sethian, J. Level Set Methods and Fast Marching Methods: Evolving Interfaces in Computational Geometry, Fluid Mechanics, Computer Vision, and Materials Science. Cambridge Monographs on Applied and Computational Mathematics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

[10] Gruau, C., Coupez, T. 3D tetrahedral, unstructured and anisotropic mesh generation with adaptation to natural and multidomain metric. in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2005, vol. 194.48, p. 4951–4976.

[11] Bernacki, M., Logé, R., Coupez, T. Level set framework for the finite-element modelling of recrystallization and grain growth in polycrystalline materials, Scripta Materialia, 2011, vol. 64.6, p. 525–528.

[12] Quan, D.L., Toulorge, T., Marchandise, E., Remacle, J.F., Bricteux. G. Anisotropic mesh adaptation with optimal convergence for finite elements using embedded geometries, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2014, vol. 268, 65–81.

[13] M Shakoor, Three-dimensional numerical modeling of ductile fracture mechanisms at the microscale, PhD Thesis, MINES ParisTech, 2016.

[14] Shi, Y., Zhang, Y. Simulation of random packing of spherical particles with different size distributions, Applied Physics A, 2008, vol. 92, p.621-626.

[15] Zhou, J., Zhang, Y., Chen, J.K. Numerical simulation of random packing of spherical particles for powder-based additive manufacturing, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 2009, vol.131-3, p.031004.

Illustrations

Table 1. Model parameters for the different media.

Table 1. Model parameters for the different media.

Fig. 4. Boundary conditions of 2D and 3D simulations in tension.

Fig. 4. Boundary conditions of 2D and 3D simulations in tension.

References

Electronic reference

Jean-Luc Bouvard, Shaoheng Feng, Florent Alexis, Marc Bernacki, Daniel Pino-Munoz, Alban Agazzi, Ronan Le Goff and Guillaume Drouel, « Generation and homogenization of foamed polymer RVEs: microstructure-mechanical properties relationship », ESAFORM 2021 [Online], Online since 08 April 2021, connection on 28 April 2024. URL : https://popups.uliege.be/esaform21/index.php?id=3814

Authors

Jean-Luc Bouvard

Mines ParisTech, PSL Research University, CEMEF - Centre de Mise en Forme des Matériaux, UMR CNRS 7635, CS 10207, 06904 Sophia-Antipolis, France. Corresponding author: Jean-Luc Bouvard. E-mail address: jean-luc.bouvard@mines-paristech.fr

Shaoheng Feng

Mines ParisTech, PSL Research University, CEMEF - Centre de Mise en Forme des Matériaux, UMR CNRS 7635, CS 10207, 06904 Sophia-Antipolis, France

Florent Alexis

Mines ParisTech, PSL Research University, CEMEF - Centre de Mise en Forme des Matériaux, UMR CNRS 7635, CS 10207, 06904 Sophia-Antipolis, France

Marc Bernacki

Mines ParisTech, PSL Research University, CEMEF - Centre de Mise en Forme des Matériaux, UMR CNRS 7635, CS 10207, 06904 Sophia-Antipolis, France

Daniel Pino-Munoz

Mines ParisTech, PSL Research University, CEMEF - Centre de Mise en Forme des Matériaux, UMR CNRS 7635, CS 10207, 06904 Sophia-Antipolis, France

Alban Agazzi

IPC - Centre Technique Industriel de la Plasturgie et des Composites, 2 rue Pierre et Marie Curie, 01100, Bellignat, France

Ronan Le Goff

IPC - Centre Technique Industriel de la Plasturgie et des Composites, 2 rue Pierre et Marie Curie, 01100, Bellignat, France

Guillaume Drouel

IPC - Centre Technique Industriel de la Plasturgie et des Composites, 2 rue Pierre et Marie Curie, 01100, Bellignat, France

Details

Title
Generation and homogenization of foamed polymer RVEs: microstructure-mechanical properties relationship
Language
en
Author, co-author
Jean-Luc Bouvard, Shaoheng Feng, Florent Alexis, Marc Bernacki, Daniel Pino-Munoz, Alban Agazzi, Ronan Le Goff and Guillaume Drouel,
Publication date
14 April 2021
Journal title
ESAFORM 2021
Copyright
CC-BY
DOI
10.25518/esaform21.3814
Permanent URL
https://popups.uliege.be/esaform21/index.php?id=3814

Statistics

Views : 591 (2 ULiège)
Downloads : 0 (0 ULiège)

Cite

Bouvard, J., Feng, S., Alexis, F., Bernacki, M., Pino-Munoz, D., Agazzi, A., Goff, R., & Drouel, G. (2021). Generation and homogenization of foamed polymer RVEs: microstructure-mechanical properties relationship. Paper presented at ESAFORM 2021. 24th International Conference on Material Forming, Liège, Belgique. doi: 10.25518/esaform21.3814